Almost all the humans have been living with a perception, that there are indispensable, this perception may be at micro level of the family or at macro level of the society, and due to such frivolous perception there is disharmony in their lives. Any human at any given point of time wants to be always right, which summarises, that it is the individual or the belief which is the nucleus and the rest all has to revolve around it. This perception, in most of the cases stretches to such an extent, that there are humans who tend to find and discover the reason for their birth on the face of earth too, as would be the case with several readers. The author with all humility and humbleness at its command would like to question, those, what is it that which is so unique in you which has led you to the belief that there needs to be a special reason for you to be “here”? There have been countless number of people who have come and died (including the ones who are taken as gods in various religions, or the ones who has laid an impression in history by the discoveries, valors, or any such act) even those were born and they died, but nothing has changed after their exit on how the logics of life have been before them. The author in no way is trying or even hinting at undermining their or yours contribution for the society, but that contribution is for the structure of the society, but no change has ever been there on the logics of life, this is the only point which is being tried to put across.
The author would urge its readers to truly try and explore, what is the cause for their struggle or longings, isn’t having a stomach full takes care of the things ( in context with the individual only) rest anything and all apart from this is being done, under the false perception of being pivotal or fulcrum of existence of other beings, may it be constituents of the family or office and so on and so forth. But it is all being carried under the impression of being indispensable, like the connotation attached “bread winner”, which in crude but real sense means, there would be no food if “the” individual wont be there, but is it really so? If that bread winner would die, then there would another one, whereas the matter of the fact is, it's like waves in the ocean, one wave is the extension of another and it leads to another and so on, but there is no “the” wave in the ocean. Like if the individual purchases a new and expensive dress, and gets appreciated, is it the individual who is getting the accolades or is it the price, brand, colour, uniqueness of the dress which is being appreciated, well the later part of the sentence holds the truth, but the perception remains, “….i wore it so it looked good…” but does the reader really agree to this feeling? Isn't the sense,"....hows this dress looking on me..." the most common statement, at least at the time when the purchase is to be made.
With this frame of thoughts and perceptions, there have been people who seek refuge in one or another faith/religion and adopt associated methodologies to unearth within, and try to explore the one which is “nothing” with something, and hence resulting in more despair, because this quest (if followed in virtuous way) tends to demolish the perception of being “indispensable”. Keeping this view of being “indispensable” in fore, newer methods are being crafted ever now and then, in which the perception is being boosted and the ethos of being another, just not the body, have been wrongly undermined. These kinds of thoughts as taught by the masters during peace and spiritual sessions, are quite similar to the lectures by the leaders of the terrorist organisations to their newly inducted members, as they are also taught that they are unique and have been chosen by the almighty to protect the religion and the world from the evil, and for attaining their goals they end up killing people. The experiences during the course of meditation enlightens of having no difference, between me (author(of course if this author qualifies to be termed as human) and other circumventing energies, may it be the free flowing energies in the air, or in the living and non living things around the author, during the course of meditation. Realising the similarity between thyself and the encompassing energies will expand the scope of your being, which now is only within the periphery of the body, when you muster this realisation , you are as magnanimous as the air and then going beyond mass, space and time keeps alluring.....
The psychics of people normally is defined by the virtues as taught by parents or elders or learnt by the company with which the person remains during its elementary age, and its during these times that certain principles are conveyed to the child which are to be followed, these principles are rigid, it is not only the case with virtues of life (termed as religion) or education in the schools, they all have one thing in common to accept what is already taken as true so the scope of exploring beyond the taught is dim. The profound science of yog, enables the practitioner to go beyond which is already known, as the things which are known had been discovered/realised sometime in the past, which means it took an endeavour of a person to reach that threshold point beyond which there was more to what is known. let me ask my wise readers, why is it that you can't go to what you know?
To undertake anything, there is a tendency to have faith/belief in it, but the author would urge its readers to discard any belief and try and differentiate between itself and any other living or non living thing on the planet. Is there any difference?